djsenter — Wpis 261 z 338
What you said still suggests that taking substances is healthy, while it really isn't :D
Senter San
Politics, Philosophy And Religion
tw. what's your most contropersial take
Fernando — Wpis 262 z 338
@218 I'm starting to come around to your 9th point.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
Reynolds — Wpis 263 z 338
My question becomes from the side of the compinies making the models shouldn't regulate it, or the governments shouldn't regulate it?
Fernando — Wpis 264 z 338
The government
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
whereismyepipen — Wpis 265 z 338
I like women. Idk if yall agree.
Fernando — Wpis 266 z 338
Hard disagree.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
khalil2009 — Wpis 267 z 338
hot take women are not even real their government constructs created to poison the minds of men through spores that they release in the air
Fernando — Wpis 268 z 338
True.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
whereismyepipen — Wpis 269 z 338
Have you ever seen a woman? So, if you have never seen a woman in your life, how do you know that they truly exist? Thus,
if we are uncertain about their existence, we cannot discount the possibility that they are just holograms created by NASA.
if we are uncertain about their existence, we cannot discount the possibility that they are just holograms created by NASA.
LordJohnEdward — Wpis 270 z 338
Under what modality?
Fernando — Wpis 271 z 338
So are we just gonna ignore this one?
-- (LordJohnEdward):
Yo, what's up chat! Its about time I show my face around here and drop a contravercial take, so here it goes. I think my most contravercial take is that I believe that the state can justly apply the death penalty to apostates.
--
-- (LordJohnEdward):
Yo, what's up chat! Its about time I show my face around here and drop a contravercial take, so here it goes. I think my most contravercial take is that I believe that the state can justly apply the death penalty to apostates.
--
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
whereismyepipen — Wpis 272 z 338
the fact that we are uncertain
LordJohnEdward — Wpis 273 z 338
That's not a modality, your account of certainty is giving lukie ass!
whereismyepipen — Wpis 274 z 338
The modality is in the phrase “cannot discount the possibility.” Because I said “cannot discount,” it indicates that my claim cannot be ruled out. When I said “possibility,” it indicates that the hologram explanation is plausible, not certain. So, the modality is epistemic modality because it concerns the degree of certainty about whether women actually exist or are holograms.
LordJohnEdward — Wpis 275 z 338
You cannot have a modality be in a fraze that employs a modal verb! That's circular just like Lukie ass!
whereismyepipen — Wpis 276 z 338
l argument
LordJohnEdward — Wpis 277 z 338
Concession time, I'll take!
musicman5464 — Wpis 278 z 338
Bruh just...no. Explain how we were all born then.
-- (khalil2009):
hot take women are not even real their government constructs created to poison the minds of men through spores that they release in the air
--
-- (khalil2009):
hot take women are not even real their government constructs created to poison the minds of men through spores that they release in the air
--
Regards, Joseph
rudolf — Wpis 279 z 338
This makes sense once you leave the social construct the government wants you to believe. Think about it deeply.
djsenter — Wpis 280 z 338
A not so controversial take, I'm losing my brain cells reading your shit. Think it's about time I depart, tc.
Senter San