Politics, Philosophy And Religion

tw. what's your most contropersial take

Założony przez khalil2009 338 wpisów ostatni wpis 12 dni temu Strona 16 z 17

#301

My arguement isn't in favor of the confederits, its complaneing of the after math from the north.

#302

You mean when they forced through the 14th amendment on threat of perpetual military occupation, then made it a condition for readmittance into the union even though the northern invasion was justified on the grounds that it is impossible for a state to leave in the first place?
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

#303

I mean thats a thing, but I just think that the 14th has ben so distructive generaly and I apose the 15th for reasons sighted before.

#304

Would've posted this in the other thread but I don't want to ddrail it further. You know what I oppose? Europeans speaking on freedom like they know what that is, or critiquing American governance like what they think about that subject matters. And more broadly speaking I oppose people who don't know how to stay in their lane.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

#306 1 polubienie Edytowano

It's certainly not my most controversial one, but Judo and martial arts in general is completely overrated.

#307 4 polubienia

I hate how the west babbles at us so-called third-world countries about women's rights, all while using women as commodities in advertisements to attract customers, among other disastrous things occurring there.
thankses and regardzes from him the dragonoid

#308 3 polubienia

Illegal immigrants who do not want to live by the standards and values of the country they choose to invade, do not deserve any privileges. That's probably one of the more controversial takes of mine.
Senter San

#309 2 polubienia

Well, worded like that, it is something I can understand better than people who just shout "all foreigners out! Especially if you mean people like those who want to establish sharia law and other similar radical things.

#310

all forners out!

#311 Edytowano

@306, I want to know more.
@307, there's a huge difference between women consentually wanting to expose themselves in commercials for money Vs. Saying women aren't allowed to leave the house without a male escort, open a bank account on their own or be educated at all.
All that I survey, I could easily destroy. From time to time, it is important to remind these small creatures of the true extent of my power.

#312

No one is ready to hear this but the third world approach to these matters is closer to the moral approach than the liberal west. Sure, it misses the mark in many ways, often times egregiously so. And yet it's still closer.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

#313

I would think the arguement of 306 is that marshal arts aren't all that useful in real sichuations. I don't think that the example he gave is a good one to show that. There are a lot of strange goofy compleately retarded forms of marshal arts though.

#314

@310 If there were no foreigners in the US, then it wouldn't be where it is today.
Senter San

#315

Thing is too, if you'd really want to go the ethnical pure way in the US, Trump should protect the indigenous people. But then I suppose birth has stronger weight than genitical purity for people with this sort of nationalist mindset.

#316

All third worldists out.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

#317

Nah that would be like giving the metal to the person who got last place. Partisipation countries can we get one ours is half taken over atm. @315. And @314 you mean the same foreners that founded the place and would be called the population of the people who built the country? F tear.

#318

Reynolds, don't you know the experts on American history are the ones who live on an entirely different continent and have their views on the matter entirely informed by whatever slop narratives enter into the popular conciousness?
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

#319

Oh shit I forgot, lets now bow down to the arbiters of all things fact. Inclueding what free speach is and history because they know all it.

#320 Edytowano

Remember. The american revolution was a spontaneous popular uprising for the ideals of egalitarianism, and upon the founding of the nation the people elected to open it's doors to all, so that anyone who wished might have the opportunity to pursue their highest aspirations on it's shores. Hence The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, and we will hear none of this talk about a distinct American identity rooted in English heritage. And we will certainly not tolerate the advancement of such claims for the purposes of providing grounds for exclusionary migration policies, that would be national socialist in spirit. The last thing you'd ever want to do is parallel national socialism in any way, shape or form.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."