Fernando — Post 21 of 34
Latino
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
____ free zone
karmien — Post 22 of 34
kiddos
greatings, Felix, alias Karmien
Mastodon: @randomfelix@dragonscave.space
WhatsApp: +4915560642152
Discord: felixius2084
Mastodon: @randomfelix@dragonscave.space
WhatsApp: +4915560642152
Discord: felixius2084
kezz — Post 23 of 34
latte
Fernando — Post 24 of 34
Catholics
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
kezz — Post 25 of 34
-- (Fernando):
Catholics
--
🤬objection: the s makes it uh, kinda gramatically incorrect? 🤬
Fernando — Post 26 of 34
It's over for me.
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
kezz — Post 27 of 34
criminal
Responding to the topic, not the last poster guys
Responding to the topic, not the last poster guys
Fernando — Post 28 of 34
Tamale
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
kezz — Post 29 of 34
wait nah we've been missing the point guys it's gotta be exactly 4 characters long
Fernando — Post 30 of 34
Kirk
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
kezz — Post 31 of 34
yeah didn't realise how harder I just made this...
Fernando — Post 32 of 34
Gay
Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."
tonio2007 — Post 33 of 34
priests
Sir-Charlie — Post 34 of 34
MODERATION!
@whereismyepipen, Kezz and Fernando, you're being warned for spam per rule 5.
Rule 5 very clearly opens by saying, "Posts should be relevant to the given forum's purpose". It further enumerates spam and low quality content as grounds for punishment under that particular clause of the rule.
There is the Community Extras forum where significant leeway is allowed in the creation of threads and, you're expected to place joke threads there. The political forum's purpose is clearly articulated and none of the posts in here match that purpose.
AS to why I gave these 3 a warning, whereismyepipen as the creator, Kezz for participating in the spam despite being warned against it yesterday, and Fernando for also participating. Everyone else were either commenting on the spam or made a one word post then left. I will be closing this thread because it serves no purpose.
@whereismyepipen, Kezz and Fernando, you're being warned for spam per rule 5.
Rule 5 very clearly opens by saying, "Posts should be relevant to the given forum's purpose". It further enumerates spam and low quality content as grounds for punishment under that particular clause of the rule.
There is the Community Extras forum where significant leeway is allowed in the creation of threads and, you're expected to place joke threads there. The political forum's purpose is clearly articulated and none of the posts in here match that purpose.
AS to why I gave these 3 a warning, whereismyepipen as the creator, Kezz for participating in the spam despite being warned against it yesterday, and Fernando for also participating. Everyone else were either commenting on the spam or made a one word post then left. I will be closing this thread because it serves no purpose.
All that I survey, I could easily destroy. From time to time, it is important to remind these small creatures of the true extent of my power.