He never was very active anyway.

He was a good guy, I don't blame him for leaving. I would also pull the plug on this programme. And shame on you Jonathan.

lmfao! oh no! chill, you know why I don't really am interested what you just said or not? Just saw another pointless discussion you where actually taking part in in another group so, well. meh! thanks for your opinion though.

-- (Louisa):
He was a good guy, I don't blame him for leaving. I would also pull the plug on this programme. And shame on you Jonathan.

--

+ shame for what? If I, might, ask that. I very very bad person!

I am sorry, I shame that I am happy that the community gets another chance and is not moderated by this person I don't have to write big storrys about because we all know them. I shame that I where actually making suggestions in post 2. I shame that someone who posts here 1 time in a year says any random thing and I responded to it and then, oh, what a horrible thing, brought questions/arguments against it. Well, yea, yall are true, the fact people acting weird on here will never change, as the fact leaving is often just the best option...
Wow, lost, well whatever. With that, I have nothing to say until we are having a new situation, for now everything is still/again pretty okay. So I wish yall a very good night!

railwayguy (Administrator). Online
say good bye to this programm is a pretty interesting definition btw, I wonder if that works while beeing online, but lol, me knows nothing!

oh by the way not all of us are adults.

I'm talking about your second post. And I agree with post 12 on this. Tact is always a better thing. Maybe you will learn that one day.
-- (Jonathan):
+ shame for what? If I, might, ask that. I very very bad person!

--

TBH, after post 2, I simply read the first line of his posts then skip.

Yeah Jonathan is just too much at this point to be honest.

I don't really read his posts at all at this point because I know it's not going to be anything of substance

Well, same for you if we allready are by honest speaking.
-- (khalil2009):
I don't really read his posts at all at this point because I know it's not going to be anything of substance

--

seems not to be. because you like my post's

Well, rarely, but then its nothing pointless as right now. Interesting what problems yall have to find time speaking about such stuff.

Also wow, its pretty crazy how you all go juj about just one post. Or if you wish two/three. But well, not even any arguments against that, or better things to say. I love it. Anything productive? Do it better then.

Lol this guy needs to be banned, also I completely understand your decision Niki, good luck with everything and we appreciate the time you have spend, keeping this community intact.

aw. No we are not even any kind of staff and searching for the ban hamer because we literaly have no other ideas. Interesthing way of thinking though. But yea, I agree, this guy should really be banned, would show him this all isn't it worth still after we got rid of the first problem.

Don't you realise he was talking about you anyway?

-- (Jonathan):
aw. No we are not even any kind of staff and searching for the ban hamer because we literaly have no other ideas. Interesthing way of thinking though. But yea, I agree, this guy should really be banned, would show him this all isn't it worth still after we got rid of the first problem.

--

I do, I was talking ironic about my self! But thanks for clarifying.
I would also think I am stupid if I were you.

The problem alot of the "Anti-arctic" people have is they don't know when to shut their damned mouths and endup making themselves look utterly retarded. Jonathan, just stop man. You're not as cute as you think you are.